Module 8:

Planning the work

8.1 Introduction

1   Creating a maintenance schedule of work (sometimes called a calendar of work) can be a great help to everyone involved in looking after a pitch. These schedules are not ‘set in stone’ guides but are meant as forward planning and progress planning and monitoring tools, basically a management ‘work in progress tool’. This means that they should be updated on a regular basis as the year progresses. At, or towards, the end of the year, the actual work carried out can be compared with the original schedule. Differences in the two can then be identified and investigated to help improve forward planning for the following year.

2   A change in finances, staff availability, weather (distinguishing between both general weather and the more extreme weather, although the latter does seem to be becoming more frequent), ground conditions, machine breakdowns, receipt or delay of materials, unavailability of materials, vandalism, unforeseen usage, excessive damage from planned usage, reschedule usage, and other reasons, can all impact when activities can actually take place.

3   So, plan out what might be realistically anticipated, monitor the situation, and adapt it accordingly. This is a much better approach than not putting it down as a record and trying to remember everything. This is not a very helpful approach for everyone involved, especially if the person with the only detailed knowledge of the schedule becomes ill, leaves, or suffers a long-term illness or injury and is unable to return to work. Being proactive is much better than being reactive, and this should make it much easier to effectively communicate what is involved to others.

4   How much will the actual work carried out over a year compare with an original plan of work? We have mentioned quite a number of factors which can impact a work schedule as well as a more detailed work programme.

  How accurate do you think a planned work schedule might be when it is looked back on after a year?

If you had to make a guess at the accuracy what percentage figure would you put on it? 10%, 50%, 99%, or one of the many other figures between 0 and 100?

What is the figure you are guessing?

You might be thinking this is a bit of an unanswerable question because it is so subjective. As you get into creating, actioning and reflecting more on live work schedules you will find that accuracy comparisons can start to float around a general guide figure.

As a general guide an informed plan, when compared a year later with what actually took place (and assuming no significantly unforeseen events took place), should typically be at least 80% accurate regards the number of occasions when work activities were carried out as well as the month in which they were planned. It is highly unlikely that 100% accuracy will be achieved due to the many variable factors, but continuous improvement will aim to keep the accuracy high.

Module progress: 5%